Innovative energy-saving buildings carry a heavy carbon cost

The construction industry is faced with the challenge of rapidly adapting its practices to minimise the amount of CO2 released from the production of building materials.

In order to do this, we need to imminently and dramatically reduce our use of and reliance on concrete and steel, two highly energy intensive building materials which account for around 15% of total global CO2 emissions. We can achieve this through two simple measures.

The first is to build less. We need to curtail the culture of rampant over-production in the building industry and encourage the refurbishment of functional existing buildings. This can be achieved through government tax incentives that promote the reclamation, rather than demolition, of disused and outdated buildings, and the introduction of legislation that requires those wishing to demolish existing structures to substantially prove their case against re-use.

As part of building less, we need to stop constructing basements, which are heavily reliant on concrete, create sub-standard space and have other impacts such as the disruption of groundwater, noise and pollution from excavation and the transportation of spoil.

Secondly, we need to substitute our use of concrete and steel for building materials with a substantially lower carbon footprint, such as engineered timber, which holds the added benefit of storing CO2 sequestered during its growth. Not only does the use of CLT and glulam contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, but the cultivation of the engineered timber industry drives reforestation, further contributing to the long-term reduction in atmospheric carbon.

随着全球建筑业稳步增加木材的使用，英国一直面临着立法，戏剧性地，不合理地限制我们对工程木材的使用，削弱我们作为先进木材建筑的全球领导者的地位，最终威胁到更广泛地采用这一拯救地球的技术。

We have spent the last 30 years focusing almost exclusively on the energy emitted by buildings in use, ignoring their principal carbon cost: the embodied energy from the extraction and manufacture of the materials in which we build.

>> Also read:Make net zero buildings the only ones worth building, architects tell COP

The consequence of this has been detrimental in our measure of carbon economics, resulting in the short-sighted praise of new buildings boasting innovative energy-saving measures, which in reality carry an embodied carbon debt that will take a century to repay.

It has taken over a decade for legislation to address this immanent concern, and we are still nowhere near establishing accurate universal methods of the calculation and consequential mandated reductions in the production of embodied carbon.

20世纪90年代，L部分立法出台，以减少能源消耗;如今，类似规模的目标可以大幅减少我们的隐含碳排放量。我们必须采取措施，促进建筑翻新的新文化和低碳材料的使用，这样我们才有可能达到减少二氧化碳的目标。